HOLLYWOOD’S GOLDEN AGE: THE GLAMOUR GIRLS
A glamour girl is one who looks good enough to eat and dresses with taste. –Evan Esar
- * * * * * * * * * *Â * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
In my “preview of coming attractions” post of Oct. 13, the subject of Hollywood glamour girls (in general) and Rita Hayworth (in particular) came up in an exchange of comments. October 17 being Rita’s birthday, it seems the appropriate day to do the appropriate post, focusing not only on Rita, but on several other becoming attractions who fill the bill by becomingly filling their dresses.
My glamour girl choices here are both limited and subjective, due not only to length-of-post considerations, but the implicit broadness of the term, e.g.: is, or is not, glamour girl of a piece with sex goddess? For the arbitrary purposes of this opus, I’ve drawn a distinction between the two by disqualifying actresses considered to be ‘pure’ sex symbols, such as Jayne Mansfield, Jane Russell. and (perhaps unfairly) Marilyn Monroe. They (and European sex symbols like Brigitte Bardot) may “look good enough to eat,” but dressing with taste was hardly their strong suit.
With that model of suitability out of the way, here are the glamour girls I think stand out as epitomizing Hollywood’s Golden Age by virtue of such disparate criteria as a touch of class, sex appeal more than skin deep, talent, and even pin-up popularity with WWII GIs.
Let’s start with the birthday girl, Rita Hayworth, who said “I like having my picture taken and being a glamorous person. I never really thought of myself as a sex goddess.”:
https://www.thevintagenews.com/2018/10/31/rita-hayworth/
My next choice is the actress called the most beautiful woman in the world in her day:
Next, the actress called the last major star to come out of the Hollywood studio system:
With apologies to the likes of Veronica Lake, Lana Turner, and Betty Grable, I will close with this glamorous actress who, but for the overriding racism of the period, could and should have been a major Hollywood star (seen here in a scene with Eddie “Rochester” Anderson and Ethel Waters from CABIN IN THE SKY (1943):
calmkate 1:32 am on October 17, 2019 Permalink |
she is hot … sounds like racism has increased over there from what we hear … white cops killing black girls in their own bedroom, they are trigger crazy!
LikeLiked by 2 people
America On Coffee 1:48 am on October 17, 2019 Permalink |
Glamour has certainly changed, right? And with that change came other big impacts.
LikeLiked by 2 people
mistermuse 8:01 am on October 17, 2019 Permalink |
Right. What is glamorous today would have been thought outlandish back in those days.
LikeLike
America On Coffee 3:20 pm on October 17, 2019 Permalink
Very true!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ashley 4:39 am on October 17, 2019 Permalink |
Brilliant!
LikeLiked by 2 people
masercot 5:10 am on October 17, 2019 Permalink |
You must’ve forgot Myrna Loy… the sexiest of all the glamour girls and one of the longest lasting (from the twenties to the fifties).
BTW, I saw Lena Horne live in Dallas, TX. As good as she is in your clip, she was even better just standing at a microphone…
LikeLiked by 3 people
mistermuse 7:54 am on October 17, 2019 Permalink |
I never looked at Myrna as being in that category — she had much more than a “touch” of class and was too unique and good of an actress. To be thought of as primarily a glamour girl would be doing her a disservice, in my opinion.
As for Lena, I never saw her in person, but she certainly was dynamic in her TV appearances later in her career. In 1943, when CABIN IN THE SKY was made (Vincente Minnelli’s directorial debut, btw), TV was still waiting in the wings, and movies (along with radio) were king, with CABIN being one of the few all-black cast films produced by a major studio.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Rivergirl 8:11 am on October 17, 2019 Permalink |
Good group. Would be interesting to see who you think would be considered glamorous today…
LikeLiked by 2 people
mistermuse 8:37 am on October 17, 2019 Permalink |
Sorry, Rg, but I’ll have to plead ignorance — I’m not into today’s celebrity scene and wouldn’t know one “glamorous” gal from another. Chalk it up to the generation crap….er, gap.
LikeLiked by 1 person
moorezart 2:34 pm on October 17, 2019 Permalink |
Reblogged this on From 1 Blogger 2 Another.
LikeLiked by 2 people
mistermuse 4:07 pm on October 17, 2019 Permalink |
My glamour girls thank you, moorezart. I thank you too, though I’m not sure what that adds to the effect.
LikeLike
moorezart 4:34 pm on October 17, 2019 Permalink
It’s all good my friend!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Carmen 3:52 pm on October 17, 2019 Permalink |
I’ve just finished reading Gone With the Wind . . .Vivien Leigh sprang immediately to mind when I read the blog post title. Loved those clips mister muse! I always learn something.
LikeLiked by 2 people
mistermuse 4:20 pm on October 17, 2019 Permalink |
I never even thought of her, Carmen — probably because she wasn’t thought of as the typical Hollywood type of glamour girl. She certainly was beautiful, though. Anyway, I’m glad you’re “always learn something” here. Maybe I’ll tell my wife and try to make her jealous.
On second thought, I’d better leave well enough alone.
LikeLike
Carmen 6:51 pm on October 18, 2019 Permalink
You know what they say about teaching a teacher. .. đ
LikeLiked by 1 person
mistermuse 8:04 pm on October 18, 2019 Permalink
They also say: Those who can, do; those who can’t, teach. For some reason, my wife (a retired teacher) never cared for that one.
LikeLike
America On Coffee 4:06 pm on October 17, 2019 Permalink |
…and Hedy Lamarr was one of the quiet tops! đ
LikeLiked by 3 people
Richard A Cahill 5:21 pm on October 17, 2019 Permalink |
The world does not lack for beautiful women, Sr. Muse, then and now. But the photography is better now. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZ1XM9LwS64
LikeLiked by 2 people
mistermuse 9:24 pm on October 17, 2019 Permalink |
The photography is certainly slicker now, but I don’t know that it makes beautiful women look more beautiful, Ricardo. To my mind, most commercials (like that clip) promoting a product with beautiful women (often with pouty, supposedly sexy facial expressions) are more of a turn-off than a turn-on, and I’m not buying what they’re selling (at least, not in that venue).
LikeLike
mlrover 10:13 am on October 22, 2019 Permalink |
The sad irony is that superficial beauty distracted from the talent and intelligence of many Hollywood “glamour” personalities. They were exploited and used. It was no wonder that Lamarr became bitter at the end. I have no sympathy for Weinstein. So many before him got away with it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
mistermuse 2:18 pm on October 22, 2019 Permalink |
In those days, only ‘strong’ female stars like Katherine Hepburn could fight off exploitation. Of course, it didn’t hurt that she wasn’t the “glamour girl” type to begin with. Nonetheless, she had the box office clout to be her own woman, and she knew it.
LikeLike
Silver Screenings 11:21 pm on November 16, 2019 Permalink |
Lena Horne certainly should have been a bigger star. She was beautiful, she could sing, and she could act. (I love her in Cabin in the Sky!) She truly was glamourous.
LikeLiked by 1 person